Its the premise that although scientifically flawed.. It can be enacted through a “meeting of the minds”. In theory everything if not impractical could be possible, it’s up to people to nail me to the wall.. Be warned though, is I actually might know more about your own doctrine and teach, or not and learn. Its essentially the hypocritical premise of advancement. If anyone can debate any of this (or add corrections, not grammar but scientifically) I will highly debate and adapt to such.